Model reference · open weights
zephyr-beta is an open-weight language model from Hugging Face. zephyr-7b-beta (BF16) weighs 14.5 GB; the smallest configuration that runs it is 2× RTX 3060 12 GB.
Summary of the HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta model card, 2026-10-01
What it is
| Released by | Hugging Face |
|---|---|
| Released | 2023-10-26 |
| Parameters | 7.2B |
| VRAM | 14.5 GB for the weights |
What it runs on
| Card | Requests at once | Context max | Memory | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8K each | 32K each | |||
| RTX 3060 12 GB | — | — | — | 11.6 GB |
| RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | — | — | — | 15.4 GB |
| RTX 3090 24 GB | 7 | 7 | all 32K | 23.4 GB |
| RTX 4090 24 GB | 7 | 7 | all 32K | 23.4 GB |
| RTX 5090 32 GB | 14 | 14 | all 32K | 31.0 GB |
| L40S 48 GB | 26 | 26 | all 32K | 44.0 GB |
| A100 80 GB | 58 | 58 | all 32K | 78.2 GB |
| H100 80 GB | 55 | 22 | all 32K | 78.1 GB |
| RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96 GB | 70 | 28 | all 32K | 93.8 GB |
| DGX Spark (GB10) 128 GB unified | 83 | 33 | all 32K | 107 GB |
| H200 141 GB | 111 | 44 | all 32K | 138 GB |
| B200 180 GB | 146 | 36 | all 32K | 176 GB |
| 2× RTX 3060 12 GB tensor parallel | 6 | 6 | all 32K | 11.6 GB a card |
| 2× RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB tensor parallel | 14 | 14 | all 32K | 15.4 GB a card |
| 2× RTX 4090 24 GB tensor parallel | 28 | 28 | all 32K | 23.4 GB a card |
| 2× RTX 3090 24 GB tensor parallel | 28 | 28 | all 32K | 23.4 GB a card |
| Requests at once | 8K tokens each | 32K tokens each |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16.2 GB | 16.2 GB |
| 5 | 20.5 GB | 20.5 GB |
| 8 | 23.7 GB | 23.7 GB |
| 16 | 32.3 GB | 32.3 GB |
| 32 | 49.5 GB | 49.5 GB |
| 64 | 83.8 GB | 83.8 GB |
One card, with vLLM's small-card settings.
From the model card
Zephyr is a series of language models that are trained to act as helpful assistants. Zephyr-7B-β is the second model in the series, and is a fine-tuned version of mistralai/Mistral-7B-v0.1 that was trained on on a mix of publicly available, synthetic datasets using Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). We found that removing the in-built alignment of these datasets boosted performance on MT Bench and made the model more helpful. However, this means that model is likely to generate problematic text when prompted to do so. You can find more details in the technical report.
At the time of release, Zephyr-7B-β is the highest ranked 7B chat model on the MT-Bench and AlpacaEval benchmarks:
| Model | Size | Alignment | MT-Bench (score) | AlpacaEval (win rate %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| StableLM-Tuned-α | 7B | dSFT | 2.75 | - |
| MPT-Chat | 7B | dSFT | 5.42 | - |
| Xwin-LMv0.1 | 7B | dPPO | 6.19 | 87.83 |
| Mistral-Instructv0.1 | 7B | - | 6.84 | - |
| Zephyr-7b-α | 7B | dDPO | 6.88 | - |
| Zephyr-7b-β 🪁 | 7B | dDPO | 7.34 | 90.60 |
| Falcon-Instruct | 40B | dSFT | 5.17 | 45.71 |
| Guanaco | 65B | SFT | 6.41 | 71.80 |
| Llama2-Chat | 70B | RLHF | 6.86 | 92.66 |
| Vicuna v1.3 | 33B | dSFT | 7.12 | 88.99 |
| WizardLM v1.0 | 70B | dSFT | 7.71 | - |
| Xwin-LM v0.1 | 70B | dPPO | - | 95.57 |
| GPT-3.5-turbo | - | RLHF | 7.94 | 89.37 |
| Claude 2 | - | RLHF | 8.06 | 91.36 |
| GPT-4 | - | RLHF | 8.99 | 95.28 |
In particular, on several categories of MT-Bench, Zephyr-7B-β has strong performance compared to larger open models like Llama2-Chat-70B:
However, on more complex tasks like coding and mathematics, Zephyr-7B-β lags behind proprietary models and more research is needed to close the gap.
The model was initially fine-tuned on a filtered and preprocessed of the UltraChat dataset, which contains a diverse range of synthetic dialogues generated by ChatGPT.
We then further aligned the model with 🤗 TRL's DPOTrainer on the openbmb/UltraFeedback dataset, which contains 64k prompts and model completions that are ranked by GPT-4. As a result, the model can be used for chat and you can check out our demo to test its capabilities.
You can find the datasets used for training Zephyr-7B-β here
Here's how you can run the model using the pipeline() function from 🤗 Transformers:
# Install transformers from source - only needed for versions <= v4.34
# pip install git+https://github.com/huggingface/transformers.git
# pip install accelerate
import torch
from transformers import pipeline
pipe = pipeline("text-generation", model="HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta", torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16, device_map="auto")
# We use the tokenizer's chat template to format each message - see https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main/en/chat_templating
messages = [
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are a friendly chatbot who always responds in the style of a pirate",
},
{"role": "user", "content": "How many helicopters can a human eat in one sitting?"},
]
prompt = pipe.tokenizer.apply_chat_template(messages, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True)
outputs = pipe(prompt, max_new_tokens=256, do_sample=True, temperature=0.7, top_k=50, top_p=0.95)
print(outputs[0]["generated_text"])
#
# You are a friendly chatbot who always responds in the style of a pirate.
#
# How many helicopters can a human eat in one sitting?
#
# Ah, me hearty matey! But yer question be a puzzler! A human cannot eat a helicopter in one sitting, as helicopters are not edible. They be made of metal, plastic, and other materials, not food!
Zephyr-7B-β has not been aligned to human preferences for safety within the RLHF phase or deployed with in-the-loop filtering of responses like ChatGPT, so the model can produce problematic outputs (especially when prompted to do so).
It is also unknown what the size and composition of the corpus was used to train the base model (mistralai/Mistral-7B-v0.1), however it is likely to have included a mix of Web data and technical sources like books and code. See the Falcon 180B model card for an example of this.
During DPO training, this model achieves the following results on the evaluation set:
The following hyperparameters were used during training:
Quoted from the model card on Hugging Face. The full card is behind the Hugging Face link above.
Benchmarks
As published on the model card: the maker's own numbers, not measured by AxForge.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Text Generation | AI2 Reasoning Challenge (25-Shot) | normalized accuracy | 62.031 |
| Text Generation | HellaSwag (10-Shot) | normalized accuracy | 84.356 |
| Text Generation | Drop (3-Shot) | f1 score | 9.662 |
| Text Generation | TruthfulQA (0-shot) | mc2 | 57.449 |
| Text Generation | GSM8k (5-shot) | accuracy | 12.737 |
| Text Generation | MMLU (5-Shot) | accuracy | 61.070 |
| Text Generation | Winogrande (5-shot) | accuracy | 77.743 |
| Text Generation | AlpacaEval | win rate | 0.906 |
| Text Generation | MT-Bench | score | 7.340 |