Model reference · open weights

Kimi-K2.6

LLMs moonshotai Vision + text 4 builds Its own licence terms 685k dl/mo

Kimi-K2.6 is an open-weight language model from moonshotai. Kimi-K2.6-GGUF (GGUF) weighs 595 GB; the smallest configuration that runs it is 8× H100 80 GB.

  • Kimi-K2.6 is an open-source, native multimodal agentic model developed by moonshotai for image-text-to-text tasks.
  • It features a Mixture-of-Experts architecture with 1 trillion total parameters, 32 billion activated parameters, and a 256K context length.
  • The model supports image and video inputs and is released under a Modified MIT License.

Summary of the moonshotai/Kimi-K2.6 model card, 2026-10-01. The estimate below is for another build of the family.

What it is

Released bymoonshotai
Released2026-04-14
Parameters1026.9B
VRAM595 GB for the weights

What it runs on

Memory and cards for Kimi-K2.6-GGUF (GGUF)

595 GBweights, file size
651 MBruntime overhead, at least

How much memory each request adds isn't estimated yet for this architecture. The weights need at least the cards below, plus room for the context.

CardWeights alone
RTX 3060 12 GB … B200 180 GB
12 smaller cards
does not fit
8× H100 80 GB
split by layers (llama.cpp)
tight
8× A100 80 GB
split by layers (llama.cpp)
tight
4× B200 180 GB
split by layers (llama.cpp)
fits
8× H200 141 GB
split by layers (llama.cpp)
fits

Builds

Sizes, precisions & builds

BuildParamsPrecisionWeightsSmallest setup
Kimi-K2.6 ↗ 1026.9BINT4 595 GB4× B200 180 GB
Kimi-K2.6-GGUF (above) ↗
packaged by unsloth
4 builds: Q2_K_XL 340 GB … BF16 2053 GB
—GGUF 595 GB8× H100 80 GB
Kimi-K2.6-NVFP4 ↗
packaged by nvidia
—NVFP4 595 GB4× B200 180 GB
Kimi-K2.6-FP8-BLOCK ↗
packaged by RedHatAI
1026.9BFP8 1031 GB8× B200 180 GB

From the model card

What moonshotai says about Kimi-K2.6

Read the model card

🤗  huggingchat  |  📰  Tech Blog

1. Model Introduction

Kimi K2.6 is an open-source, native multimodal agentic model that advances practical capabilities in long-horizon coding, coding-driven design, proactive autonomous execution, and swarm-based task orchestration.

Key Features

  • Long-Horizon Coding: K2.6 achieves significant improvements on complex, end-to-end coding tasks, generalizing robustly across programming languages (Rust, Go, Python) and domains spanning front-end, DevOps, and performance optimization.
  • Coding-Driven Design: K2.6 is capable of transforming simple prompts and visual inputs into production-ready interfaces and lightweight full-stack workflows, generating structured layouts, interactive elements, and rich animations with deliberate aesthetic precision.
  • Elevated Agent Swarm: Scaling horizontally to 300 sub-agents executing 4,000 coordinated steps, K2.6 can dynamically decompose tasks into parallel, domain-specialized subtasks, delivering end-to-end outputs from documents to websites to spreadsheets in a single autonomous run.
  • Proactive & Open Orchestration: For autonomous tasks, K2.6 demonstrates strong performance in powering persistent, 24/7 background agents that proactively manage schedules, execute code, and orchestrate cross-platform operations without human oversight.

2. Model Summary

ArchitectureMixture-of-Experts (MoE)
Total Parameters1T
Activated Parameters32B
Number of Layers (Dense layer included)61
Number of Dense Layers1
Attention Hidden Dimension7168
MoE Hidden Dimension (per Expert)2048
Number of Attention Heads64
Number of Experts384
Selected Experts per Token8
Number of Shared Experts1
Vocabulary Size160K
Context Length256K
Attention MechanismMLA
Activation FunctionSwiGLU
Vision EncoderMoonViT
Parameters of Vision Encoder400M

3. Evaluation Results

  1. General Testing Details
    • We report results for Kimi K2.6 and Kimi K2.5 with thinking mode enabled, Claude Opus 4.6 with max effort, GPT-5.4 with xhigh reasoning effort, and Gemini 3.1 Pro with a high thinking level.
    • Unless otherwise specified, all Kimi K2.6 experiments were conducted with temperature = 1.0, top-p = 1.0, and a context length of 262,144 tokens.
    • Benchmarks without publicly available scores were re-evaluated under the same conditions used for Kimi K2.6 and are marked with an asterisk (*). Except where noted with an asterisk, all other results are cited from official reports.
  2. Reasoning Benchmarks
    • IMO-AnswerBench scores for GPT-5.4 and Claude 4.6 were obtained from z.ai/blog/glm-5.1.
    • Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) and other reasoning tasks were evaluated with a maximum generation length of 98,304 tokens. By default, we report results on the HLE full set. For the text-only subset, Kimi K2.6 achieves 36.4% accuracy without tools and 55.5% with tools.
  3. Tool-Augmented / Agentic Tasks
    • Kimi K2.6 was equipped with search, code-interpreter, and web-browsing tools for HLE with tools, BrowseComp, DeepSearchQA, and WideSearch.
    • For HLE-Full with tools, the maximum generation length is 262,144 tokens with a per-step limit of 49,152 tokens. We employ a simple context management strategy: once the context window exceeds the threshold, only the most recent round of tool-related messages is retained.
    • For BrowseComp, we report scores obtained with context management using the same discard-all strategy as Kimi K2.5 and DeepSeek-V3.2.
    • For DeepSearchQA, no context management was applied to Kimi K2.6 tests, and tasks exceeding the supported context length were directly counted as failed. Scores for Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-5.4, and Gemini 3.1 Pro on DeepSearchQA are cited from the Claude Opus 4.7 System Card.
    • For WideSearch, we report results under the "hide tool result" context management setting. Once the context window exceeds the threshold, only the most recent round of tool-related messages is retained.
    • The test system prompts are identical to those used in the Kimi K2.5 technical report.
    • Claw Eval was conducted using version 1.1 with max-tokens-per-step = 16384.
    • For APEX-Agents, we evaluate 452 tasks from the public 480-task release, as done by Artificial Analysis(excluding Investment Banking Worlds 244 and 246, which have external runtime dependencies)
  4. Coding Tasks
    • Terminal-Bench 2.0 scores were obtained with the default agent framework (Terminus-2) and the provided JSON parser, operating in preserve thinking mode.
    • For the SWE-Bench series of evaluations (including Verified, Multilingual, and Pro), we used an in-house evaluation framework adapted from SWE-agent. This framework includes a minimal set of tools—bash tool, createfile tool, insert tool, view tool, strreplace tool, and submit tool.
    • All reported scores for coding tasks are averaged over 10 independent runs.
  5. Vision Benchmarks
    • Max-tokens = 98,304, averaged over three runs (avg@3).
    • Settings with Python tool use max-tokens-per-step = 65,536 and max-steps = 50 for multi-step reasoning.
    • MMMU-Pro follows the official protocol, preserving input order and prepending images.

4. Native INT4 Quantization

Kimi-K2.6 adopts the same native int4 quantization method as Kimi-K2-Thinking.

5. Deployment

[!Note] You can access Kimi-K2.6's API on https://platform.moonshot.ai and we provide OpenAI/Anthropic-compatible API for you. To verify the deployment is correct, we a

Quoted from the model card on Hugging Face. The full card is behind the Hugging Face link above.

© 2026 AxForge · EU-hosted AI infrastructure Pricing Docs Trust Privacy Terms