Model reference · open weights
BitCPM-CANN is an open-weight language model from openbmb. BitCPM-CANN-8B-gguf (GGUF) weighs 2.4 GB; the smallest configuration that runs it is RTX 3060 12 GB.
Summary of the openbmb/BitCPM-CANN-3B model card, 2026-10-01. The estimate below is for another build of the family.
What it is
| Released by | openbmb |
|---|---|
| Released | 2026-05-15 |
| VRAM | 2.4 GB for the weights |
What it runs on
How much memory each request adds isn't estimated yet for this architecture. The weights need at least the cards below, plus room for the context.
| Card | Weights alone |
|---|---|
| RTX 3060 12 GB | fits |
| RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | fits |
| RTX 3090 24 GB | fits |
| RTX 4090 24 GB | fits |
| RTX 5090 32 GB | fits |
| L40S 48 GB | fits |
| A100 80 GB | fits |
| H100 80 GB | fits |
| RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96 GB | fits |
| DGX Spark (GB10) 128 GB unified | fits |
| H200 141 GB | fits |
| B200 180 GB | fits |
Builds
| Build | Params | Precision | Weights | Smallest setup |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BitCPM-CANN-3B ↗ | — | BF16 | 7.2 GB | RTX 3060 12 GB |
| BitCPM-CANN-8B-gguf (above) ↗ | — | GGUF | 2.4 GB | RTX 3060 12 GB |
From the model card
BitCPM-CANN is the first end-to-end 1.58-bit (ternary) large language model training system natively built on Huawei Ascend NPU. The system integrates quantization-aware training (QAT) into the Megatron-LM framework with MindSpeed acceleration, covering the full training stack from custom ternary operators to distributed parallel training on Ascend 910B.
We train a family of four models—BitCPM-CANN-0.5B/1B/3B/8B—and evaluate them against their full-precision MiniCPM4 counterparts across 11 benchmarks. The 1B/3B/8B models retain 95.7%–97.2% of full-precision performance, while enabling approximately 6× memory reduction at inference time. QAT introduces only 5% training throughput overhead (148 vs. 155 TFLOP/s per NPU).
The models in this repository are in pseudo-quantized (fake quantization) format. This means the weights are stored in standard floating-point format with ternary values already applied during training. You can load and run inference with these models exactly the same way as full-precision models—no special quantization libraries or custom kernels are required.
| Model | HuggingFace | GGUF |
|---|---|---|
| BitCPM-CANN-0.5B | openbmb/BitCPM-CANN-0.5B | openbmb/BitCPM-CANN-0.5B-gguf |
| BitCPM-CANN-1B | openbmb/BitCPM-CANN-1B | openbmb/BitCPM-CANN-1B-gguf |
| BitCPM-CANN-3B | openbmb/BitCPM-CANN-3B | openbmb/BitCPM-CANN-3B-gguf |
| BitCPM-CANN-8B | openbmb/BitCPM-CANN-8B | openbmb/BitCPM-CANN-8B-gguf |
Since BitCPM-CANN models are in pseudo-quantized format, you can use them exactly like standard full-precision models:
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
import torch
torch.manual_seed(0)
path = 'openbmb/BitCPM-CANN-3B'
device = "cuda"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(path)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(path, torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16, device_map=device, trust_remote_code=True)
# User can directly use the chat interface
responds, history = model.chat(tokenizer, "Write an article about Artificial Intelligence.", temperature=0.7, top_p=0.7)
print(responds)
# User can also use the generate interface
# messages = [
# {"role": "user", "content": "Write an article about Artificial Intelligence."},
# ]
# prompt_text = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
# messages,
# tokenize=False,
# add_generation_prompt=True,
# )
# model_inputs = tokenizer([prompt_text], return_tensors="pt").to(device)
# model_outputs = model.generate(
# **model_inputs,
# max_new_tokens=1024,
# top_p=0.7,
# temperature=0.7
# )
# output_token_ids = [
# model_outputs[i][len(model_inputs[i]):] for i in range(len(model_inputs['input_ids']))
# ]
# responses = tokenizer.batch_decode(output_token_ids, skip_special_tokens=True)[0]
# print(responses)
BitCPM-CANN models are evaluated against their full-precision MiniCPM4 counterparts across 11 benchmarks spanning commonsense reasoning, domain knowledge, and mathematics & reasoning.
| Task | 8B FP | 8B Ternary | 3B FP | 3B Ternary | 1B FP | 1B Ternary | 0.5B FP | 0.5B Ternary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARC-c | 87.46 | 86.10 | 80.34 | 78.98 | 64.41 | 67.12 | 51.86 | 50.51 |
| ARC-e | 95.06 | 93.47 | 92.77 | 88.36 | 79.89 | 79.01 | 71.78 | 65.08 |
| BoolQ | 84.89 | 83.39 | 79.85 | 77.89 | 68.38 | 65.50 | 62.29 | 43.55 |
| PIQA | 80.52 | 78.78 | 70.57 | 72.69 | 66.16 | 65.45 | 60.99 | 58.49 |
| WinoGrande | 63.30 | 61.17 | 58.41 | 52.96 | 51.62 | 53.28 | 51.07 | 51.54 |
| CMMLU | 80.62 | 78.92 | 78.11 | 76.53 | 74.57 | 67.42 | 65.22 | 60.49 |
| C-Eval | 81.36 | 77.50 | 75.85 | 75.89 | 73.25 | 65.96 | 66.11 | 60.74 |
| MMLU | 75.83 | 70.65 | 66.95 | 64.41 | 57.71 | 57.71 | 55.55 | 50.73 |
| MMLU-Redux | 77.14 | 69.85 | 65.82 | 60.07 | 54.80 | 54.16 | 48.00 | 43.79 |
| BBH | 76.72 | 70.70 | 68.29 | 68.30 | 64.40 | 60.40 | 49.87 | 47.44 |
| GSM8K | 91.51 | 85.75 | 81.64 | 79.45 | 63.15 | 61.56 | 52.08 | 39.42 |
| Average (11 tasks) | 81.31 | 77.84 | 74.42 | 72.32 | 65.30 | 63.42 | 57.71 | 51.98 |
| Retention | 95.7% | 97.2% | 97.1% | 90.1% |
Quoted from the model card on Hugging Face. The full card is behind the Hugging Face link above.